Amazon's new Appstore feature could very well be patent suit bait
Amazon's latest addition to its Appstore may very well ignite the ire of an litigious patent holder, and develop a new legal and monetary headache for app makers.
Amazon yesterday announced its in-app purchase service, offering developers a way to let users spend some money after only apps. Although they are not the right feature among mobile apps, it adds new ways for developers to create revenue after an app appears to have been downloaded, whether or not this was paid or free.
That particular mechanism, which was suitable for app makers on Google'sAndroid and Apple's iOS platforms for a while now, has piqued the interest rate associated with the aggressive patent-holding firm named Lodsys. Approximately, the Texas-based company peppered numerous developers -- big and small -- with requests for licensing deals for utilizing in-app purchase with your threat of litigation if deals weren't made.
While Google, Apple, and Microsoft are licensees of your firm's technology, Lodsys argued that these particular licensing deals to be able to cover applications from third-party developers. The firm has told CNET that Amazon is not a licensee. Putting it simply ,, without coming straight out and saying it, they are surely inching toward a declaration that Amazon should likewise license Louis Vuitton iPhone 5 Case their patents to make a great feature.
"Amazon just isn't licensed," Lodsys told CNET in a very statement. "Lodsys Group LLC continue to seek license agreements from firms that are infringing the claims within the portfolio."
The company also re-iterated what has licensing agreement with Apple, Google and Microsoft "(does) not extend to 3rd party applications which operate on those platforms."
Amazon did not reply to repeated requests for reply to the challenge, rrncluding a Google spokesman declined to comment.
So where does that leave Amazon? Unlike Google, Apple, and Microsoft, Amazon isn't a purveyor of the underlying os which it's selling apps on. Instead, the company's platform revolves around a standalone store, separate from one who Google includes as it is with Android devices.
Nonetheless, Amazon's own Appstore has quickly proven itself as a thoughtful strong contender to Google's own Play service (formerly referred to as Android Market). At the study released recently covering mobile-application store activity throughout the 1st two months of 2012, Flurry Analytics -- a corporation that tracks usage among apps on iOS, Android, Amazon, there are -- said Amazon was attracting much more revenue per user than Google. Compared with every $1 spent per user in Apple's App Store, developers on Amazon's platform were generating 89 cents, the study said. By comparison, developers on Google's Play service were generating 24 cents per user.
Those numbers are specifically relevant considering the rise of so-called "freemium" titles, software that's given away gratis, after which you'll relies upon in-app purchasing to change money because of makers. According to an investigation released in February by another mobile-analytics company named Distimo, around 65 percent of Amazon's Appstore were paid apps, a lot the firm says held "stable" with the latter area of 2011.
No stranger to patent protection
Amazon offers a storied history with software patents, building its business around its "1-Click" patent the firm was granted in 1998. As your name would suggest, the device lets shoppers spend your money that has a single click, versus being carried right through to a website where they may be needed to send in billing information as well as personal information.
Amazons 1-Click patent.
(Credit:USPTO)
The patent was really a reason behind controversy around the technology world after Amazon visited court against rival Barnes & Noble, sega's which has a similar purchasing system on its Webpage. Both companies reached funds within the issue in 2002. Separately, Apple signed a licensing agreement with Amazon that include it in its own products in 2000.
Several years later, the nation Patent and Trademark Office ordered a re-examination of a patent upon the request of your New Zealand actor named Peter Caveley, who cited prior art. That resulted in a rejection of a few among the patent's claims, as well as amendments by Amazon. In March 2010, the USPTO passed the 1-Click patent through your re-examination process, using stipulation it's tied to a virtual shopping cart.
"Amazon built a tremendous business around that innovation, and licensed it to major players including Apple," said Erin-Michael Gill, the managing director and chief intellectual property officer at MDB Capital Group. "Apple is usually that innovation to make it easier for developers' apps to generally be purchased oniTunes. That's the fact that the speakers are suggested to work."
By comparison, Gill says that Lodsys' current strategy seeks an equivalent ends, but comes with it inside potentially destructive manner.
"Because it would appear that Lodsys is trying to leverage the inefficiencies on the patent system to extract royalties -- apparently searching to settle with developers that Chanel iPad Mini Case have resources to protect themselves, for less than inside of the organization tariff of litigation -- iphone 5 wallet case there finally ends up not this virtuous cycle of innovation promoting further innovation," Gill said. "This brings about the ecosystem planning the offensive."
A still from Amazons promotional video of that in-app purchase feature.
(Credit:Amazon)
Lodsys patents under attack
There tend to be notable efforts to stop app developers somewhere safe when making use of built-in APIs, in addition to get all of Lodsys' patents invalidated. Apple, whose developers were a few of the first to remain targeted, sent correspondence to Lodsys last May, saying it turned out "undisputedly licensed to the (patents)," adding that app makers were protected Burberry iPhone 5 Case under its licensing agreement. Lodsys publicly rebuffed that letter, stating that Apple was mistaken. The firm then proceeded to file for a case against several additional app developers, and send similar licensing requests to Android developers.
Related storiesHow expensive is that patent lawsuit able to runs you?Scoop: Bounty looking for invalidating Lodsys patentsApple throws weight behind devs on patent issueiOS app makers targeted in patent spat
After specific to it developers were targeted, Google responded last August by filing a request because of the United states of america Patent and Trademark office seeking a re-examination of a couple of some Lodsys patents. That process still is on-going, though work there was no newly filed suits against Android developers.
Seemingly outside of both those efforts was one launched last year from Article One Partners, a profitable business that crowd-sources intellectual property research. It offered an incentive around the party that found prior art, or examples of pre-existing technologies and other IP that used as evidence to invalidate no less than one of Lodsys' patents. All three these studies were completed successfully, ending up with $15,000 property value prize money being doled along to three researchers.
"When folks like Microsoft, Apple, now presumably Amazon start pulling together and pooling resources to actually dig into these assets, every little nuanced issue becomes critical," Gill said.